Contracts are the backbone of business transactions and legal agreements. They establish the terms, conditions, and obligations between parties, ensuring that all parties involved are on the same page. When creating a contract, many individuals and businesses turn to attorneys to draft these legally binding documents. While attorneys are experts in the field of law, and their assistance is invaluable in many legal matters, there are situations where an attorney-created contract might pose risks. In this blog, we will explore the reasons why relying solely on an attorney to draft your corporate contracts might not always be the best approach.


Lack of Industry knowledge


Attorneys, undoubtedly, are well-versed in the vast landscape of the law. However, the intricacies and idiosyncrasies that define various industries often elude even the most seasoned legal professionals. Picture industries like technology, healthcare, or construction, each possessing its own labyrinthine network of regulations, standards, and practices. While an attorney brings a wealth of legal knowledge to the table, they might not possess an intimate understanding of the subtle nuances within your specific industry. This deficiency can inadvertently lead to significant oversights in contract drafting. For instance, an attorney may inadvertently omit clauses critical to your industry or insert terms that, while legally sound, are utterly irrelevant to your field. The consequence? The very effectiveness and enforceability of the contract might be compromised, potentially setting the stage for future disputes.


Standardization Over Customization


Attorneys often resort to a toolbox of standard contract templates when tasked with drafting agreements, and there’s no denying the value of these templates as starting points. They come preloaded with established legal language and structures, providing a robust foundation for crafting contracts. However, where they sometimes fall short is in their ability to create a contract that truly caters to your unique needs and circumstances. Contracts should be as distinct and finely tuned as the agreements they encapsulate, reflecting the specific intricacies and nuanced requirements of your situation. In practice, however, a one-size-fits-all approach occasionally prevails, leading to a document that inadequately addresses the intricate details and nuanced demands of your specific agreement. This oversight can leave you vulnerable to disputes because the contract may not align seamlessly with the peculiarities of your transaction, potentially resulting in legal conflicts that could have been preemptively mitigated with a more customized approach.




Contracts, as legal instruments, inherently serve as structured roadmaps, outlining a set of predetermined terms and conditions. Consequently, they may not readily accommodate deviations or alterations from these established terms. In the dynamic realm of business, circumstances evolve, unexpected events unfold, and agreements must adapt. A contract that lacks the flexibility to accommodate these shifts can swiftly become a source of contention. Disputes may emerge when parties seek to modify their agreement in response to unforeseen developments, potentially escalating into full-blown legal battles. The ability to adapt and evolve is vital in business, and a contract should be a flexible tool that allows for adjustments when necessary. The rigidity of some attorney-drafted contracts can hinder this necessary adaptability, potentially impeding the smooth operation of your business.


Overly Complex Language


Legal documents, skillfully crafted by attorneys, often abound with complex language and legal jargon. While this elevated style of communication may serve a paramount purpose in certain legal contexts, it can erect a formidable barrier to comprehension for the parties directly involved in the contract. Contracts are more than mere instruments of legality; they are tools designed to facilitate mutual understanding and agreement between the parties involved. Excessive complexity in language can engender confusion and misunderstandings, effectively undermining the very purpose of the contract. Achieving clarity and mutual comprehension stands as the cornerstone of any successful contractual relationship. Ensuring that the language of the contract is accessible and easily understood by all parties involved is essential for reducing the risk of disputes and fostering a cooperative and productive working relationship.


Cost Considerations


While the expertise of an attorney is undeniably invaluable, it does come with associated costs. Legal professionals typically bill their services by the hour, and the process of crafting a comprehensive contract can often prove to be a time-intensive endeavor. As the hours accumulate, legal fees can become a noticeable and sometimes substantial component of your budget. For small businesses and individuals, especially those operating within constrained financial resources, this cost factor can develop into a significant burden. Striking the delicate balance between the necessity of legal expertise and the constraints of your budget becomes a financial equation to carefully weigh, requiring astute financial planning to ensure that legal expenses do not outweigh the potential benefits and protections offered by the contract.


Delayed Turnaround Time


Attorneys, as professionals, commonly juggle multiple clients and legal matters concurrently, each with its own unique demands and timelines. Consequently, entrusting an attorney with the task of contract drafting can often lead to delayed turnaround times. Waiting for an attorney-drafted contract to be completed can impede your business transactions and hinder your ability to seize time-sensitive opportunities. The inherent pace of legal processes doesn’t always align seamlessly with the urgency of your business needs, potentially creating bottlenecks in your operations and affecting your ability to respond promptly to dynamic market conditions. Recognizing this delay factor is essential for businesses aiming for agility and responsiveness.


Limited Access to Updates


The legal landscape is a dynamic realm, subject to continuous evolution as laws and regulations adapt to the shifting needs of society and the economy. This dynamism necessitates that contracts remain in lockstep with these changes to ensure they remain legally sound and compliant. However, when you exclusively rely on an attorney for contract creation, accessing updates or revisions can present certain limitations. Legal professionals, by the nature of their profession, are often inundated with extensive caseloads and the demands of their practice, leaving them with limited bandwidth to proactively provide these updates. As a result, you might find yourself with a contract that can swiftly become outdated or non-compliant with the prevailing legal requirements of the day. This, in turn, exposes you to potential legal risks and disputes that could have been preemptively mitigated with an up-to-date contract. Staying vigilant about the need for ongoing updates and revisions is crucial to ensuring the continued relevance and legality of your contractual agreements.


Reduced Ownership and Control


Entrusting the task of contract creation to an attorney can lead to a scenario where your ownership and control over the resulting document are significantly curtailed. Any prospective changes, amendments, or modifications to the contract may necessitate additional legal consultations, which, naturally, translate into more billable hours and added legal fees. While legal counsel is indispensable in complex matters, this reduced autonomy can profoundly impact your ability to efficiently manage and adapt the contract in response to evolving circumstances. It has the potential to introduce inefficiencies into your business processes and can lead to heightened costs over time, both in terms of legal fees and lost opportunities.


Potential for Biased Drafting


In specific scenarios, an attorney may unintentionally exhibit bias towards one party during the contract drafting process. This inadvertent bias can stem from a variety of factors, such as the attorney’s familiarity with one party’s needs or an incomplete understanding of the other party’s perspective. While attorneys rigorously strive for impartiality, it’s essential to recognize that human biases can occasionally seep into the drafting process. Consequently, a contract that carries such an inherent bias may not comprehensively safeguard the interests of all parties involved. This, in turn, elevates the likelihood of disputes and disagreements emerging in the future, potentially leading to protracted legal battles and their associated costs. Vigilance in ensuring a balanced and fair contract is essential to mitigate the potential for such conflicts.


Lack of Understanding of Business Objectives


Attorneys predominantly channel their focus towards the legal intricacies of a contract. While undeniably crucial, legal compliance represents only one facet of a well-rounded agreement. The broader business objectives and strategic intentions of the parties entering into the contract sometimes take a backseat in the attorney’s purview. However, a well-drafted contract should aspire to be more than just legally sound; it should seamlessly align with the overarching goals of your business. Overlooking these broader objectives can potentially hinder your capacity to achieve the desired outcomes from the agreement. Striking the right balance between legal precision and crafting a contract that functions as a practical, business-centric tool for realizing your overarching ambitions remains an essential consideration. Balancing these facets ensures that your contractual agreements not only meet legal standards but also contribute meaningfully to the strategic growth and success of your enterprise.



While attorneys play a critical role in the legal landscape, it’s important to recognize that attorney-created contracts may not always align perfectly with your specific needs and circumstances. To mitigate the risks associated with attorney-drafted contracts, consider collaborating with legal professionals who possess industry-specific knowledge and engaging in open communication to ensure that your contract addresses your unique requirements. Additionally, utilizing contract management software and seeking legal advice when necessary can help you strike a balance between legal compliance and practicality in your contracts, ultimately reducing the risks associated with a one-size-fits-all approach. Remember, a well-drafted contract is a key component of a successful business transaction, and careful consideration and customization are essential to protecting your interests.


Hi I am Zahid Butt Digital Marketing expert & Outreach specialist in SEO :Email:

Leave A Reply